In OKTZ cost component structure is component admnistration overhead. This overhead have atributte sales and administration costs, so that is not relevant to stock valuation. In OKKN in valuation variant is same costing sheet as in product order. In terms of period-end closing calculate overhead to product order (administration overhead) and then variances occur under overhead cost elements which are assigned to cost components which are not relevant to stock valuation (the difference between Total target cost and total actual costs on the order). This variance should not be post to FI or should not be calculate. Why this way SAP behave? How is he behave SAP well? What are they hereto need?
Under normal circumstances, you will have a costing sheet with administration costs and selling costs only for simulation costing purpose where we need to know full cost for fixing the price of the product etc.
But for production purpose, we dont need that kind of costing sheet. If you have that kind of then you will have problems like you said.
The suggested method is,
1. have one costing sheet with admin and selling costs so that you can simulate the costs for managerial decision purpose
2. Have another costing sheet with admin and selling costs for production purpose
But for production purpose, we dont need that kind of costing sheet. If you have that kind of then you will have problems like you said.
The suggested method is,
1. have one costing sheet with admin and selling costs so that you can simulate the costs for managerial decision purpose
2. Have another costing sheet with admin and selling costs for production purpose
No comments:
Post a Comment